<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;Grey Power has a point&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/256/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/256</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jens Meder</title>
		<link>http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/256#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Meder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=256#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I wish to be corrected on this if I am wrong, but for gaining confidence of the elecorate,  I do believe it is urgent to articulate the wealth  creative economic growth policy to make  higher NZ Super + welfare benefits sustainable at reduced taxation rates.
Is not allocation of the NZ Super Fund - accumulated at present at approximately 2% of GNP (Gross National Product) - to Personal Accounts, the most directly personal wealth creative tax rebate possible, more so than if the same amount as a freely consumable tax reduction?
(And  don't forget the taxation revenue expenditure  released for  other purposes through that, making more goodies increasingly available on a sustainable basis, in direct proportion to Persoanl Accounts  growth)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to be corrected on this if I am wrong, but for gaining confidence of the elecorate,  I do believe it is urgent to articulate the wealth  creative economic growth policy to make  higher NZ Super + welfare benefits sustainable at reduced taxation rates.<br />
Is not allocation of the NZ Super Fund - accumulated at present at approximately 2% of GNP (Gross National Product) - to Personal Accounts, the most directly personal wealth creative tax rebate possible, more so than if the same amount as a freely consumable tax reduction?<br />
(And  don&#8217;t forget the taxation revenue expenditure  released for  other purposes through that, making more goodies increasingly available on a sustainable basis, in direct proportion to Persoanl Accounts  growth)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hazeldine</title>
		<link>http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/256#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hazeldine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=256#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Good on you Winston,76.8%! seems just a dream that it ever happened.
 We should remember that a leopard never changes it's spots, remember Jim Bolger's "watch my lips, no ifs no buts, I will remove the extra tax on Super" We all know what happened. I would put money on National having a special no alternative problem to take care of after the election (if they happen to get the most votes)
 We trust you to take care of that Winston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on you Winston,76.8%! seems just a dream that it ever happened.<br />
 We should remember that a leopard never changes it&#8217;s spots, remember Jim Bolger&#8217;s &#8220;watch my lips, no ifs no buts, I will remove the extra tax on Super&#8221; We all know what happened. I would put money on National having a special no alternative problem to take care of after the election (if they happen to get the most votes)<br />
 We trust you to take care of that Winston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
