Comments on: …National’s true agenda was on Agenda http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/268 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:17:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Joy http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/268#comment-303 Joy Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:56:24 +0000 http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=268#comment-303 I listened to Bob Jones on tv this morning "important people" seemed to be his major focus... then a comment on how Australia doesn't have ACC. I dare say, if he's been lounging in Australia, he's probably bought a load of shares in private medical insurance companies. Taking donations from such people must equate to doing deals with the devil. better luck with better donor support I listened to Bob Jones on tv this morning “important people” seemed to be his major focus… then a comment on how Australia doesn’t have ACC. I dare say, if he’s been lounging in Australia, he’s probably bought a load of shares in private medical insurance companies. Taking donations from such people must equate to doing deals with the devil. better luck with better donor support

]]> By: Bill Hazeldine http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/268#comment-267 Bill Hazeldine Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:36:17 +0000 http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=268#comment-267 I heard someone on talk back say that they saw Rodney Hide as John Key's sacrificial lamb. I see Rodney more of a sacrificial goat. During their forty years in the wilderness the Jewish priests would lay hands on a male goat to transfer their sins to it and drive it out of camp in to the wilderness, they would then be free to carry on sinning for another year. What has Rodney Hide actually achieved? What in fact has ACT and National actually achieved for New Zealand over the last Parliamentary term? By their works we will know them! New Zealand First's works are self evident, in spite of all the time wasted by those who put self interest before the people they are supposed to represent National and ACT are saying that a vote for New Zealand First is a vote for Labour. I believe that a vote for ACT is a vote for National, Rodger Douglas,Richard Prebble and the whole Mad Hatter's Tea Party. Remember a leopard can't change it's spots, the hidden agenda bucket is leaking all over the place, who knows what else is yet to slip out?When will Bill English make his move, Where is Murray McCully hiding? Will Tony Ryall cut the ceiling on doctor's fees? What will Maurice Williams do about Tauranga's tollfree bridges? Will Gerry Brownlee selfdestruct? If a vote for New Zealand First is a vote for Labour and stable government and progress for our people, I say bring it on. My respect for John Key went down the drain when I saw a desperate wanna be prime minister shoot himself in the foot on TV I heard someone on talk back say that they saw Rodney Hide as John Key’s sacrificial lamb. I see Rodney more of a sacrificial goat. During their forty years in the wilderness the Jewish priests would lay hands on a male goat to transfer their sins to it and drive it out of camp in to the wilderness, they would then be free to carry on sinning for another year.
What has Rodney Hide actually achieved? What in fact has ACT and National actually achieved for New Zealand over the last Parliamentary term? By their works we will know them!
New Zealand First’s works are self evident, in spite of all the time wasted by those who put self interest before the people they are supposed to represent
National and ACT are saying that a vote for New Zealand First is a vote for Labour. I believe that a vote for ACT is a vote for National, Rodger Douglas,Richard Prebble and the whole Mad Hatter’s Tea Party.
Remember a leopard can’t change it’s spots, the hidden agenda bucket is leaking all over the place, who knows what else is yet to slip out?When will Bill English make his move, Where is Murray McCully hiding? Will Tony Ryall cut the ceiling on doctor’s fees? What will Maurice Williams do about Tauranga’s tollfree bridges? Will Gerry Brownlee selfdestruct?
If a vote for New Zealand First is a vote for Labour and stable government and progress for our people, I say bring it on. My respect for John Key went down the drain when I saw a desperate wanna be prime minister shoot himself in the foot on TV

]]> By: Bill Hazeldine http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/268#comment-262 Bill Hazeldine Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:58:03 +0000 http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=268#comment-262 National's bucket of hidden agenda is spinging more leaks! National’s bucket of hidden agenda is spinging more leaks!

]]> By: Asenati http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/268#comment-244 Asenati Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:15:40 +0000 http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=268#comment-244 PPP will only work if the contract agreement and arrangements of all risks associated with it have been checked thoroughly. There will always be bureaucracy in these kind of deals, and often the tax payers end up paying for the mistakes made by those who will benefit from them. I am yet to see any evidence that will prove how PPP can work out for NZ successfully. I wonder if the people of Pakuranga and Howick will be happy to pay the road tolls of $50 a week. PPP will only work if the contract agreement and arrangements of all risks associated with it have been checked thoroughly.

There will always be bureaucracy in these kind of deals, and often the tax payers end up paying for the mistakes made by those who will benefit from them.

I am yet to see any evidence that will prove how PPP can work out for NZ successfully.
I wonder if the people of Pakuranga and Howick will be happy to pay the road tolls of $50 a week.

]]> By: Jens Meder http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/268#comment-240 Jens Meder Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:32:19 +0000 http://www.winstonpeters.com/?p=268#comment-240 Aaron, improved public transport sounds good to me, but from what source would it be subsidised, if costing much more to run than revenue collected? Would it eliminate the projected, costly roading needs? And if not, what is your opinion on low interest infrastructure finance (up to a point) from the NZSF? Aaron, improved public transport sounds good to me, but from what source would it be subsidised,
if costing much more to run than revenue collected? Would it eliminate the projected, costly roading needs? And if not, what is your opinion on low interest infrastructure finance (up to a point) from the NZSF?

]]>