Comments on: …this website has been set up so we can talk directly… http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/3 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:06:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Wealth Creation http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/3#comment-1676 Wealth Creation Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:33:28 +0000 http://drteeth.hosts.net.nz/winstonpeters.com/?p=3#comment-1676 I hope all is well. I'm out trying to find some other people with some of the same interests I have. Hope all stays well. Chuck I hope all is well. I’m out trying to find some other people with some of the same interests I have.

Hope all stays well.

Chuck

]]> By: F. Siatuu http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/3#comment-394 F. Siatuu Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:40:39 +0000 http://drteeth.hosts.net.nz/winstonpeters.com/?p=3#comment-394 Savings is a fantastic concept for the NZ public to adopt, with all its accrued benefits. Unfortunately, in the present climate, it is not so readily excepted and while NZFirst appears to give the idea its' tacit approval, NZFirst needs to focus on policies that are readily exceptable to the present voters, policies that are of immediate value. The long term, more contentious policies may then be introduced and implemented once we have our "feet under the table". It should be pointed out, the present climate is one of immediatacy, with very little thought of tomorrow and NZFirst needs to take this into account formulating its policies. I wish our policy makers the best in these trying times and the coming election. Savings is a fantastic concept for the NZ public to adopt, with all its accrued benefits. Unfortunately, in the present climate, it is not so readily excepted and while NZFirst appears to give the idea its’ tacit approval, NZFirst needs to focus on policies that are readily exceptable to the present voters, policies that are of immediate value. The long term, more contentious policies may then be introduced and implemented once we have our “feet under the table”. It should be pointed out, the present climate is one of immediatacy, with very little thought of tomorrow and NZFirst needs to take this into account formulating its policies.
I wish our policy makers the best in these trying times and the coming election.

]]> By: Anthea Hatfield http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/3#comment-359 Anthea Hatfield Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:31:51 +0000 http://drteeth.hosts.net.nz/winstonpeters.com/?p=3#comment-359 It seems to me that Mr Glenn gave money to NZ First and the Labour party to buy something and my guess is he tried to buy a Diplomatic Passport. Thank goodness for ministers like Winston Peters who can not be corrupted like this. It seems to me that Mr Glenn gave money to NZ First and the Labour party to buy something and my guess is he tried to buy a Diplomatic Passport. Thank goodness for ministers like Winston Peters who can not be corrupted like this.

]]> By: AlexM http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/3#comment-129 AlexM Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:56:26 +0000 http://drteeth.hosts.net.nz/winstonpeters.com/?p=3#comment-129 Your blog is interesting! Keep up the good work! Your blog is interesting!

Keep up the good work!

]]> By: Jens Meder http://www.winstonpeters.com/archives/3#comment-25 Jens Meder Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:33:01 +0000 http://drteeth.hosts.net.nz/winstonpeters.com/?p=3#comment-25 Perplexed about the seemingly luke- warm enthusiasm within NZ First on allocating the NZ Super Fund to PAs (Personal Accounts), I would like to draw attention to the following: A lot of opposition to the unnecessarily complicated super savings scheme of 1997 was stirred up by the belief, that it would lead to the demise of our widely supported taxation based equal super to all, and somehow deliver more for the wealthy. Are we aware how easy it is to show, that NZSF Personal Accounts will actually strengthen the sustainability of our taxes based equal NZ Super to all in an egalitarian way with visibly improved fairness, and totally removed motivation to have it means tested or even replaced by say KiwiSavings? And which party will be able to argue, that the increasingly (though never totally)long term savings based financing of our NZ Super will not be an influential factor towards a higher savings culture in NZ, of accelerated more widespread wealth creation, ownership, and economic growth - visible from the 1st year of NZSF Personal Account allocation? If that cannot shown to be wrong, how can it fail to inspire public enthusiasm for a better future for all, in such a simple way? Perplexed about the seemingly luke- warm enthusiasm within NZ First on allocating the NZ Super Fund to PAs (Personal Accounts), I would like to draw attention to the following:
A lot of opposition to the unnecessarily complicated super savings scheme of 1997 was stirred up by the belief, that it would lead to the demise of our widely supported taxation based equal super to all, and somehow deliver more for the wealthy.
Are we aware how easy it is to show, that NZSF Personal Accounts will actually strengthen the sustainability of our taxes based equal NZ Super to all in an egalitarian way with visibly improved fairness, and totally removed motivation to have it means tested or even replaced by say KiwiSavings?
And which party will be able to argue, that the increasingly (though never totally)long term savings based financing of our NZ Super will not be an influential factor towards a higher savings culture in NZ, of accelerated more widespread wealth creation, ownership, and economic growth - visible from the 1st year of NZSF Personal Account allocation?
If that cannot shown to be wrong, how can it fail to inspire public enthusiasm for a better future for all, in such a simple way?

]]>